Comments on: IronPython and PyFit PYTHONPATH Ordering http://www.peterryan.net/2008/06/19/ironpython-and-pyfit-pythonpath-ordering/ 1 4 8 9 27 Fri, 21 Nov 2008 08:40:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 By: peter http://www.peterryan.net/2008/06/19/ironpython-and-pyfit-pythonpath-ordering/#comment-215 peter Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:26:32 +0000 http://www.peterryan.net/2008/06/19/ironpython-and-pyfit-pythonpath-ordering/#comment-215 In both examples I am using an absolute path. My /PathToPyFit was just a replacement from the actual path on my system which contained a proprietary fragment. In both examples I am using an absolute path. My /PathToPyFit was just a replacement from the actual path on my system which contained a proprietary fragment.

]]> By: Michael Foord http://www.peterryan.net/2008/06/19/ironpython-and-pyfit-pythonpath-ordering/#comment-214 Michael Foord Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:21:45 +0000 http://www.peterryan.net/2008/06/19/ironpython-and-pyfit-pythonpath-ordering/#comment-214 It's hard to tell, but it looks from your example like you are using a relative path in your code whereas you specified an absolute path in the environment variable. It is either some subtle difference due to this, or the ordering in the order in the path as you suggest. Putting some prints into the Fitnesse module may help you diagnose it - but I can't spot anything obvious from your description here. It’s hard to tell, but it looks from your example like you are using a relative path in your code whereas you specified an absolute path in the environment variable.

It is either some subtle difference due to this, or the ordering in the order in the path as you suggest.

Putting some prints into the Fitnesse module may help you diagnose it - but I can’t spot anything obvious from your description here.

]]>